Pressure-Driven Transport in Tapered Graphene Channels for Energy-Efficient Desalination
PDF

Keywords

Nanofluidic Desalination
Ion Exclusion
Water Permeability
Channel Geometry
Driving Force
Scale-Up

Abstract

Nanofluidic Desalination is being reorganized around the joint demands of performance with evidence quality, resource limits, and transfer across settings. This methodological synthesis evaluates how confinement, taper geometry, pressure, and inertial transport shape water-ion separation. The comparison integrates 4 focal papers with 13 independently retrieved publications confirmed at bibliographic registration or publisher level. The analysis is organized around ion exclusion, water permeability, channel geometry, driving force, and scale-up. The synthesis resists treating results from heterogeneous studies as exchangeable, the review compares task scope, modeling premises, and evaluation limits. Across the literature, the literature consistently implies that advances in nanofluidic desalination become credible when structure-property relationships are evaluated together and when uncertainty about operando characterization is reported explicitly. The resulting account aligns method selection to implementation risk, making transfer failures visible, and proposes a research agenda centered on explicit comparators, boundary tests, and reproducible artifacts.

PDF

References

Wang, T., Chen, B., Shao, X., Zheng, H., Hu, X., & Jiang, H. (2022). Simulations of Tapered Channel in Multilayer Graphene as Reverse Osmosis Membrane for Desalination. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology-Mater. Sci. Ed., 37, 314-323.

Wang, T., Huang, L., Pei, J., Hu, X., & Jiang, H. (2022). Efficient water desalination using Bernoulli effect. Desalination and Water Treatment, 272, 37-49.

Fan, X., Liu, Y., & Quan, X. (2019). A novel reduced graphene oxide/carbon nanotube hollow fiber membrane with high forward osmosis performance. Desalination, 451, 117-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2018.07.020

Kim, Y. M., Ebro, H., & Kim, J. H. (2016). Molecular dynamics simulation of seawater reverse osmosis desalination using carbon nanotube membranes. Desalination and Water Treatment, 57(43), 20169-20176. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2015.1112982

Altaee, A., Zaragoza, G., & van Tonningen, H. R. (2014). Comparison between Forward Osmosis-Reverse Osmosis and Reverse Osmosis processes for seawater desalination. Desalination, 336, 50-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2014.01.002

Wan Azelee, I., Goh, P. S., Lau, W. J., & Ismail, A. F. (2018). Facile acid treatment of multiwalled carbon nanotube-titania nanotube thin film nanocomposite membrane for reverse osmosis desalination. Journal of Cleaner Production, 181, 517-526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.212

Shi, Q., Gao, H., Zhang, Y., Meng, Z., Rao, D., Su, J., et al. (2018). Bilayer graphene with ripples for reverse osmosis desalination. Carbon, 136, 21-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2018.04.053

Jasim, H. K., Al-Ridah, Z. A., & Naje, A. S. (2024). Graphene oxide–carbon nanotube composite membrane for enhanced removal of organic pollutants by forward osmosis. Desalination and Water Treatment, 318, 100363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dwt.2024.100363

Vatanpour, V., & Sanadgol, A. (2020). Surface modification of reverse osmosis membranes by grafting of polyamidoamine dendrimer containing graphene oxide nanosheets for desalination improvement. Desalination, 491, 114442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2020.114442

Kashif, M., Sabri, M. A., Zhang, N., & Banat, F. (2024). Graphene: A diamond hammer for cracking hard nuts in reverse osmosis desalination membranes. Desalination, 581, 117552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2024.117552

Cohen-Tanugi, D., & Grossman, J. C. (2015). Nanoporous graphene as a reverse osmosis membrane: Recent insights from theory and simulation. Desalination, 366, 59-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2014.12.046

Park, J., Choi, W., Kim, S. H., Chun, B. H., Bang, J., & Lee, K. B. (2010). Enhancement of Chlorine Resistance in Carbon Nanotube Based Nanocomposite Reverse Osmosis Membranes. Desalination and Water Treatment, 15(1-3), 198-204. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2010.1686

Binger, Z. M., & Achilli, A. (2020). Forward osmosis and pressure retarded osmosis process modeling for integration with seawater reverse osmosis desalination. Desalination, 491, 114583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2020.114583

Mahdavi, H., & Rahimi, A. (2018). Zwitterion functionalized graphene oxide/polyamide thin film nanocomposite membrane: Towards improved anti-fouling performance for reverse osmosis. Desalination, 433, 94-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2018.01.031

Prince, H. A., Usta, M., & Daskiran, C. (2025). Energy-efficient multi-stage reverse osmosis modules: A viable competitor to centrifugal reverse osmosis?. Desalination, 613, 119035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2025.119035