Abstract
Federated machine unlearning has a trust problem. A model provider may claim to have removed a task or client contribution, yet a data subject cannot infer honest execution from the final weights alone. The supplied course architecture proposes recording masks and deletion states on a consortium blockchain, but placing complete model state on-chain or proving an entire training trajectory would create high latency, energy cost, and metadata exposure. This paper proposes CMA-ZK, a Chunked Mask Commitment architecture for zero-knowledge-ready unlearning audits. Task masks, parameter increments, and authorization bits are committed in fixed-size chunks under an append-only Merkle root. A withdrawal affects only the relevant chunks and their declared dependencies. The proof interface verifies that the old commitment was valid, the authorized mask was reset, the repair update used an allowed state transition, and the new chunks aggregate to the next public root. Raw records, complete gradients, and unaffected parameters remain at institutional edge nodes. We construct a seeded discrete-event model with eight workers, 9,000 requests, Poisson arrivals, and lognormal service times. At an arrival rate of two requests per second, CMA-ZK achieves 0.40 s median and 0.68 s p95 latency, compared with 2.30 s and 3.88 s for a checkpoint-proof design. A retraining-plus-monolithic-proof design saturates at approximately 0.83 requests per second and reaches 6,108 s p95 latency in the same scenario. Under the declared workload parameters, CMA-ZK uses 7.8 ms verification time, an 18 KB proof, and 1.7 Wh per request. The study supports a conditional scaling hypothesis. It does not demonstrate that a real proof system will achieve those values. Trustworthy deployment still requires circuit verification, randomness governance, key management, statistical unlearning tests, and independent log monitoring.
References
Bourtoule, L., Chandrasekaran, V., Choquette-Choo, C. A., et al. (2021). Machine Unlearning. 2021 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 141-159. https://doi.org/10.1109/SP40001.2021.00019
Sekhari, A., Acharya, J., Kamath, G., and Suresh, A. T. (2021). Remember What You Want to Forget: Algorithms for Machine Unlearning. NeurIPS 34, 18075-18086. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2021/hash/9627c45df543c816a3ddf2d8ea686a99-Abstract.html
Eisenhofer, T., Riepel, D., Chandrasekaran, V., et al. (2025). Verifiable and Provably Secure Machine Unlearning. IEEE SaTML. https://doi.org/10.1109/SaTML64287.2025.00033
Jia, H., Yaghini, M., Choquette-Choo, C. A., et al. (2021). Proof-of-Learning: Definitions and Practice. 2021 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy. https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.05633
Fang, C., Jia, H., Thudi, A., et al. (2022). Proof-of-Learning Is Currently More Broken Than You Think. arXiv:2208.03567. https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.03567
Liu, G., Ma, X., Yang, Y., Wang, C., and Liu, J. (2020). Federated Unlearning. arXiv:2012.13891. https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.13891
Fraboni, Y., Van Waerebeke, M., Scaman, K., et al. (2024). SIFU: Sequential Informed Federated Unlearning for Efficient and Provable Client Unlearning in Federated Optimization. AISTATS, PMLR 238, 3457-3465. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v238/fraboni24a.html
Nguyen, T.-H., Vu, H.-P., Nguyen, D. T., et al. (2024). Empirical Study of Federated Unlearning: Efficiency and Effectiveness. ACML, PMLR 222, 959-974. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v222/nguyen24a.html
Weng, J., Yao, S., Du, Y., et al. (2022). Proof of Unlearning: Definitions and Instantiation. arXiv:2210.11334. https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.11334
Laurie, B., Langley, A., and Kasper, E. (2013). Certificate Transparency. RFC 6962. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6962
Groth, J. (2016). On the Size of Pairing-Based Non-interactive Arguments. EUROCRYPT 2016, LNCS 9666, 305-326. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49896-5_11
Tabassi, E. (2023). Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0). NIST AI 100-1. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AI.100-1
European Parliament and Council. (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689: Artificial Intelligence Act. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj
Özdenizci, O., Rueckert, E., and Legenstein, R. (2025). Privacy-Aware Lifelong Learning. arXiv:2505.10941. https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.10941
Tao, J., Liu, Z., Lyu, R., and Cao, X. (2026). A Scalable Data Governance Architecture for Privacy-Aware Intelligent Learning Systems in Lifelong. Course-supplied PDF manuscript.
